The Psychology of Soap Operas: Cliffhangers, Companionship, and the Story That Never Ends

A Brief History

The soap opera began on radio in the 1930s, where continuing daytime dramas, often sponsored by manufacturers of household soaps and detergents seeking to reach the women who were their primary audience, found great popularity. It was this sponsorship that gave the form its name, the soap opera, the continuing serial drama sponsored by soap manufacturers. These early radio serials established the form, the continuing daytime drama following a cast of characters through their ongoing lives, that would define the soap opera. With the rise of television, the soap opera migrated to the new medium and flourished, becoming a staple of daytime television and, in some cases, running for decades, following their characters across enormous spans of time and building audiences whose engagement spanned years. The television soap opera developed the form's characteristic features, the large cast, the interwoven storylines, the heightened melodrama, the cliffhangers, and the sheer continuity that allowed audiences to follow characters across years of their fictional lives. The form also spread internationally, with soap operas and their close relatives, the telenovelas and continuing serials of many national television cultures, becoming central forms of popular entertainment around the world. The soap opera's endurance and its international spread testify to the power of its form and to the deep human needs its stories serve.

The Story That Never Ends

The defining feature of the soap opera is its endlessness, its structure as a continuing serial that never concludes, always advancing, always leaving stories unresolved, always promising more, and this endless, unresolved structure is central to its capacity to hold its audience. The soap opera never ends, its stories continuing indefinitely, always advancing and always leaving threads unresolved, and this endlessness is not a limitation but the very source of the form's grip. The power of the unresolved to hold our attention is illuminated by what psychologists call the Zeigarnik effect, the tendency for unfinished or interrupted tasks and stories to remain active in the mind, generating a tension that seeks resolution. Named for the psychologist Bluma Zeigarnik, who observed that people remember interrupted tasks better than completed ones, the effect reflects the mind's tendency to hold unresolved matters in an active state, a tension that persists until the matter is resolved. The soap opera exploits this effect systematically through its endless unresolved storylines and its cliffhangers, the unresolved situations generating a tension that keeps the viewer engaged, seeking the resolution that the form perpetually promises but perpetually defers. The cliffhanger, in particular, the episode that ends at a moment of unresolved tension, exploits the Zeigarnik effect directly, the unresolved situation generating a tension that draws the viewer back for the next episode.

The soap opera's endlessness also allows a depth of engagement with character and story that shorter forms cannot achieve, the years of continuity allowing the audience to know the characters deeply and to be invested in their ongoing lives. The soap opera's characters develop across years, their histories accumulating, their relationships deepening, and this long continuity allows the audience an unusually deep knowledge of and investment in the characters, an engagement built over years of following their lives. This depth of engagement, made possible by the form's endless continuity, is a substantive source of its grip, the audience's long investment in the characters creating a connection that shorter forms, which cannot build such extended histories, cannot match.

Characters Who Feel Like Family

The deep, long engagement with the soap opera's characters gives rise to the parasocial relationships that are central to the form's appeal, the sense that the characters, followed for years, have become like people the viewer knows, even like family. Through years of following their lives, the viewer comes to feel that the soap opera's characters are familiar, known, even loved, forming parasocial relationships with them as real, in their felt quality, as relationships with actual acquaintances. Parasocial relationships, the one-sided but genuinely felt relationships that audiences form with media figures, are particularly deep in the case of the soap opera, whose long continuity allows the audience to know the characters across years of their lives, deepening the parasocial bond beyond what shorter forms allow. The viewer who has followed a character for years, who knows their history, their relationships, their struggles, forms a parasocial bond of unusual depth, the character becoming a familiar presence, a known figure, even a kind of friend or family member. This depth of parasocial connection is a substantive source of the soap opera's appeal and of the devotion it commands.

These parasocial relationships can serve a substantive function of companionship, particularly for viewers who are isolated or alone, the familiar characters providing a sense of connection and company. Research on the soap opera and similar forms has long noted their companionship function, the way that the familiar characters can provide a sense of connection and company, particularly for viewers who are isolated, homebound, or lonely. The daily visit with the familiar characters can provide a rhythm and a connection that eases isolation, the parasocial bond offering a sense of company that, while not a substitute for genuine relationships, can provide real comfort. This companionship function is a substantive service the soap opera provides, particularly for isolated viewers, though one that, it should be noted, is best complemented rather than replaced by genuine relationships.

The Pleasures of Heightened Emotion

The soap opera is characterized by heightened, melodramatic emotion, its stories filled with intense loves, betrayals, tragedies, and reversals, and this heightened emotion, far from being a mere excess, serves substantive psychological functions. Through the soap opera, the viewer can experience vicariously the intense emotions of its stories, the passion, the heartbreak, the outrage, the triumph, a heightened emotional experience enjoyed safely, at the remove of fiction. This vicarious emotional experience can be genuinely satisfying, offering an engagement with intense emotion that the viewer's own life may not provide, a heightened emotional experience enjoyed without the real costs that such intense emotions would carry in life.

The soap opera can also serve the function of mood management, the regulation of one's emotional state through the choice of media, the viewer turning to the soap opera to alter or enhance their mood. Media can serve to manage mood, and the soap opera, with its reliable provision of engaging emotion and familiar company, can serve this function, the viewer turning to it to lift a low mood, to fill an empty time, to provide the engagement and emotion that improve their state. Additionally, the extravagant troubles of the soap opera's characters can offer the viewer a certain downward social comparison, the sense that, whatever one's own difficulties, they are less extravagant than the characters' troubles, a comparison that can, in a modest way, improve the viewer's sense of their own situation.

The Social Brain

A deeper source of the soap opera's appeal may lie in the way it engages the human social brain, our evolved capacity for tracking and reasoning about complex social relationships, the very capacity that the soap opera's tangled webs of relationship exercise. The soap opera is, at its heart, about relationships, the tangled webs of love, betrayal, alliance, and conflict among its characters, and following these relationships engages the human capacity for social cognition. Human beings possess a highly developed capacity for social cognition, for tracking, remembering, and reasoning about complex social relationships, a capacity that evolved to navigate the intricate social worlds of human groups. This social cognition is deeply engaging to us; we are fascinated by social information, by who is allied with whom, who has betrayed whom, who loves and who resents whom, the very information that gossip trades in and that our social brains are built to process. The soap opera provides an endless supply of exactly this social information, its tangled webs of relationship engaging the social brain's fascination with the alliances, betrayals, and entanglements of a complex social world. Following the soap opera is, in this sense, an exercise of the social brain, an engagement of the human fascination with social relationships that the form's tangled webs richly provide.

The soap opera also functions as a kind of moral drama, its stories engaging the viewer in the moral evaluation of the characters' actions, the judgment of right and wrong that its dramas of betrayal, loyalty, and justice invite. The soap opera's stories are, in large part, moral dramas, engaging the viewer in judging the characters' conduct, in caring about whether wrongs are punished and virtues rewarded. This engagement of moral judgment is a substantive aspect of the form's appeal, the moral dramas inviting the viewer's evaluation and their investment in the moral outcomes, the punishment of the villains and the vindication of the sympathetic. This moral engagement exercises the human concern with justice and moral evaluation, a further way in which the form engages deep human capacities and concerns.

Reflections for the Viewer

The soap opera, often dismissed as trivial, is in fact a form that engages deep human capacities and serves substantive psychological needs. For those who enjoy it, the soap opera offers engaging entertainment and familiar company. For those who reflect on its appeal, the soap opera offers a window into the human engagement with narrative, parasocial connection, emotion, and the social relationships that our social brains find so absorbing. The grip of the unresolved storyline, the deep parasocial bond with the long-familiar characters, the vicarious experience of heightened emotion, the engagement of the social brain by the tangled webs of relationship, each of these draws on a substantive human capacity or need, and recognizing them can illuminate the sources of the enjoyment the soap opera provides. For viewers reflecting on the companionship function that the soap opera can serve, a thoughtful note is worth adding. The parasocial connection with the familiar characters can provide a real sense of company and comfort, particularly for those who are isolated or lonely, and there is nothing wrong with the comfort this provides. But it is worth recognizing that parasocial connection, valuable as it can be, is not a substitute for the genuine relationships that most fully meet the human need for connection, and that the companionship of the soap opera is best complemented, rather than replaced, by genuine relationships. If the soap opera provides you with valued company, that is a genuine good, and one that can coexist with, and ideally be complemented by, the genuine connections that most fully satisfy the need for company and belonging. A few questions are worth sitting with: What is the story I cannot stop thinking about, and what is unresolved in it? Which characters, real or fictional, do I visit most reliably? And is the company I am getting complementing the company I have, or standing in for it?

The skills that turn watching into reflecting are ones families can build together, through teaching emotional regulation and building confidence in children, so that a child learns to notice what a story is doing to them and what company they are actually getting. For the companion piece in this series, see the psychology of game shows.

Frequently asked questions